The 69un.do journal

How to be a helpful mentor: the first conversation

Start with one work question, agree how to collaborate and review a concrete example, with prompts for a useful follow-up

Two men in suits talking beside a glass railing

The takeaway

Begin with a specific question and a piece of work to discuss. Agree how you will communicate, explore the example and explain your feedback. Finish with an action the person chooses and a way to review their attempt.

To be a helpful mentor, begin with a specific question: making sense of a work situation, presenting evidence of a skill or choosing a next learning step. Explain which experience you can contribute, agree how you will work together and finish conversations with an action the other person chooses.

Wolfson College’s Mentor Connect programme at the University of Oxford frames mentoring as support for a person’s own decisions and sets out participants’ responsibilities and communication arrangements. This is one academic programme’s approach, rather than a universal professional standard. Read the Wolfson Mentor Connect guidelines.

The following editorial outline uses illustrative work situations. Adapt it to the question and time available.

Choose one question for the first meeting

“Help me develop” leaves a lot to decide. Ask the person to bring a small piece of material they are allowed to discuss: a task description, a draft email or a work sample. Then identify the particular point where they are getting stuck.

Broad requestA question to exploreWhat to bring
I want to speak more confidentlyHow can I explain a decision at the next meetingThree points and a question for the audience
I want to change directionWhich small task could I try firstTwo options and the time available
I want to show my experienceHow can I describe my contribution to a projectOne work example without restricted information

For the last request, use our guide to demonstrating expertise through a portfolio. A mentor can help someone make their account clearer without inventing achievements for them.

Agree how you will work together

Before discussing the material, settle the meeting length, communication channel and preparation involved. You might agree: “We will discuss one draft; questions between meetings go into a shared document; we will choose the next meeting after the first attempt.” Both participants can revise this proposed arrangement.

Also decide which materials may be shared, who can see notes and how to reschedule. Permission to discuss a situation does not automatically include permission to publish it or pass on someone’s contact details. If you also manage the person, make clear when you are discussing development and when you are assessing required work.

If your support includes introducing colleagues, agree on the introduction with both people first. Our guide to networking mistakes includes examples of manageable requests and following up without pressure.

Explore the example before offering advice

Consider an illustrative situation: a colleague is drafting an explanation of a project delay. First, ask them to describe the purpose of the message and read the draft. Then ask: “What decision does the reader need to make?” and “Where can the reader see what has already been completed?”

After listening, suggest one change and explain why. Instead of “You are bad at concise writing”, try: “The date appears in paragraph three; could we put it near the start so the reader sees the request sooner?” Let the person rewrite the passage. Their revision gives you something concrete to discuss next time.

Before reviewing the work, agree on how you will give feedback. The examples of constructive criticism and personal attacks can help you discuss specificity, respectful delivery and room for a response.

Distinguish advice, learning and an assignment

A conversation may reveal that a basic skill needs more practice. Discuss which learning format could provide that practice and useful feedback. If you are assigning work that must be done, describe that assignment separately, including the result, deadline and decision-making authority. Our delegation examples show how those details can fit together.

Agree beforehand on how you will review the arrangement. The guide to mentoring benefits and limits includes observable outcomes and questions for examining what the meetings contributed.

Finish with a short record

  • The question you explored
  • What the person will try before another conversation
  • The material that will show what happened
  • When it would be useful to review the attempt

At the next meeting, compare the original question with the attempt. Is the message clearer? Was the chosen task possible? What remains unresolved? If the conversations are not providing the help needed, change the arrangement or bring it to a close. Meeting counts alone do not establish whether mentoring is useful.

How was the article?

One tap helps us understand what you find useful

Discussion

Comments: 0

It’s quiet here. Be the first to share your experience.